I read Seymour Hersh’s OBL theory so you don’t have to

Tiles and bricks from Osama bin Laden's
Tiles and bricks from Osama bin Laden’s Abbottabad hideaway

Seymour Hersh has an incredible story in the London Review of Books that purports to reveal the truth about Osama bin Laden’s life and death in Abbottabad. The crucial details are contained in a single paragraph:

This spring I contacted Durrani and told him in detail what I had learned about the bin Laden assault from American sources: that bin Laden had been a prisoner of the ISI at the Abbottabad compound since 2006; that Kayani and Pasha knew of the raid in advance and had made sure that the two helicopters delivering the Seals to Abbottabad could cross Pakistani airspace without triggering any alarms; that the CIA did not learn of bin Laden’s whereabouts by tracking his couriers, as the White House has claimed since May 2011, but from a former senior Pakistani intelligence officer who betrayed the secret in return for much of the $25 million reward offered by the US, and that, while Obama did order the raid and the Seal team did carry it out, many other aspects of the administration’s account were false.

What follows is a masterclass in pieces of this type. It starts with an unusual tale and a difficult-to-answer question: How on earth was it that bin Laden was able to live right under the noses of the Pakistani military establishment, hiding in plain sight? From there it weaves conspiracy theory, anonymous quotes and just enough truth to concoct an utterly plausible story – but one utterly devoid of facts.

The main source is anonymous. He is described as a “retired senior intelligence official”, which could mean pretty much anything.  And most damning of all, he is described as “knowledgeable” about the early intelligence to find and kill bin Laden – which again, when you stop to actually weigh the words, means absolutely zilch. (Interestingly, he also turns out to be an authority on Saudi-Pak relations, the Pakistani military, the US aid programme, Barack Obama’s media briefing strategy, Jimmy Carter and a whole bunch of other things on which he is quoted at length.)

So what are we left with? The only corroboration offered in the story comes from other unnamed officials – and even then only tangential stuff that doesn’t support the thesis – and a retired ISI officer. None offers any verifiable facts. Just vague suggestions that the new account sounds about right, or that the ISI was accused by US officials of working with AQ or the Taliban (hardly surprising).

And there are details that Hersh gets wrong along the way. The US did not say there was a network of couriers keeping bin Laden in touch with AQ – just two brothers – for example.

But for the soft minded it will all ring true.

Which is exactly what conspiracy theories set out to do: Take something odd and weave a plausible explanation. And just because it is plausible doesn’t make it true.


15 thoughts on “I read Seymour Hersh’s OBL theory so you don’t have to

  1. Who are you and what does Mr. Hersh have to gain if it isn’t true. If this was a court of law, yes, I would want names and addresses. However, it is not and, frankly, finding out that Obama lied, is not an earth shattering news. We have come to expect it. He is a lie, afterall.

  2. Your analysis is lazy, poorly written and lacks direction. Spend a little more time putting the point across, please…

  3. I can add a few questions. If airspace access was permitted by the Pakistanis, why use stealth Blackhawks, rather than ordinary ones? And why attempt to land on the compound roof? And why coach Matt Bissonnette and Rob O’Neill (and the rest of Red Squadron, I presume) to give identical details about the firefight Hersh claims never happened (Khalid killed on stairs, etc), only to have them disagree about UBL’s death? Moreso, if this is a fait accompli that will be unopposed, with plans to only announce it a week later as a drone strike, why gather so many senior figures in the Situation Room? I find Hersh’s version, with all the well-synchronized lying liars it requires, far less plausible than the official version.

  4. Yes Adrian, I agree completely. I tried to avoid getting into the things that don’t make sense as then we are conspiracy theorists’s territory. Also why did Pak military initially praise US then change mind and condemn the Abbottabad operation, if they had known all along it was coming. I could go on…

  5. I could go on, too. And rumor has it that Larry ‘whitey video’ Johnson is Hersh’s principle source. If so, then LRB’s creed should be about where Rolling Stone’s is…

  6. the unnamed source sounds very much like the ubiquitous ex ISI general hamid gul. The source of all ISI fairy tales

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s