But Lord Macdon…

But Lord Macdonald of River Glaven, QC, the former Director of Public Prosecutions, said that bans on groups were hard to enforce and to prosecute not least because of frequent name changes.
He said: “It’s far better to put people under surveillance and to gather direct evidence of their lawbreaking, whether it’s acts of incitement or plain hate speech. I certainly think we could target some groupings and certain individuals more aggressively in this way — and I think the public would rightly welcome that.”

This line is in The Times today (link here but behind paywall), as part of its coverage of the Woolwich killing. It made me think of Pakistan and question about how banned groups such as Lashkar-e-Taiba or Sipah-e-Sahaba can simply change name and continue operating…. So it’s not just Pakistan where bans are ineffective.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s