Aid and Security in Pakistan

Pakistan is the sort of place where you might not always want to advertise your links to the US. In the past month, American helicopters have killed two Pakistani soldiers, the CIA has stepped up its drone strikes in the tribal areas and thousands of people have demonstrated against the imprisonment of Aafia Siddiqui.

So if you were, say, a Western aid worker you might a few reservations about delivering goods with a nice red, white and blue logo with a row of stars and stripes on it…

Anyway this is what the good people at USAID are insisting on. Inevitably, charities tried to avoid displaying it too prominently – and maybe US officials were prepared to turn a blind eye – but that was until Richard Holbrooke visited and expressed his concern that the US was not getting sufficient credit for the hundreds of millions of dollars in aid being poured into Pakistan.

As a result, charities have been reminded of their obligation to use the logo. Although there are waivers for the most dangerous areas (Khyber Pakhtunkwa and Fata) they have been told these will be reviewed after 120 days. And none is being awarded for anywhere else.

Some of the problems with this are set out by Samuel Worthington of Interaction in The Washington Post. Such is the strong feeling among aid agencies that some – including, I understand, Oxfam – are prepared to give up millions of dollars in funding rather than risk more lives. As I report in The Daily Telegraph today, some of the aid world’s biggest names have put together a strongly-worded response to USAID policy, urging that Washington follows other major donors (the EU’s Echo and the UK’s DfID) in dropping branding in Pakistan. They argue:

We recommend that there should be no US branding at this present moment in Pakistan. There is no security analysis to support that a shift to branding aid in Pakistan will mitigate risk for INGO staff, partners and beneficiaries. Instead, there are strong indicators that branding will attract violent attacks for both economic and ideologically-motivated reasons. Branding in flood-affected areas must not be used as a test-case because the outcomes are likely to be fatal and impact on the longer-term ability of humanitarian agencies to deliver assistance in Pakistan. As an alternative, we propose that a communications strategy be developed by all key parties, with the aim of improving US visibility among the various target audiences.

But there’s a problem with dropping branding in regions of insecurity. Aid is increasingly being used overtly as a tool of foreign policy. As USAID makes clear, development has been added to diplomacy and defence as key tactics of national security. Britain’s DfID under Andrew Mitchell has followed suit, tying development assistance to foreign policy goals. But if you can’t brand aid in places such as Pakistan, Afghanistan, Somalia or Sudan, then part of its power in winning hearts and minds has been lost.

So far, American officials have been pretty bullish about the policy. Hillary Clinton even questioned the courage of aid workers, saying they were “afraid” to be associated with the US.

But it is not a question of courage. The aid workers I know are aware of the risks they face. Many here in Pakistan here now knew Linda Norgrove, who was kidnapped and killed in Afghanistan. It is a question of knowing the limits of acceptable risks. Using a stars and stripes logo lies on the wrong side of stupid.

If it was a question of courage, then none of them would leave Islamabad in anything other than a bulletproof car – which is the only way American diplomats are allowed to travel.


54 thoughts on “Aid and Security in Pakistan

  1. I guess there are special people, that do these job regardless of the danger of it .. The crazy thing is that can be killed for delivering their help.. Brave people.

  2. I guess there are special people, that do these job regardless of the danger of it .. The crazy thing is that can be killed for delivering their help.. Brave people.

  3. I tottaly agree when is said if it was a question of courage, then none of them would leave Islamabad in anything other than a bulletproof car – which is the only way American diplomats are allowed to travel.

  4. I really admire those aid workers! They can easily be injured or something even worse every day, and yet every day they spend helping others. That is real humanity at its best!

  5. Great Article Your blog post about this topic is convenience and inspiration with me. A friend once informed me about some of the suggestions you share however I thought it was not proper because I had some other opinion which had been kept with me for years. Regarding your article, I right now know John appeared to be right. I think I should send him a letter immediately. Probably include your website link likewise. He too has to know more of the things people have everyone has learned from your blog post. Thanks

  6. Thanks for sharing such wonderful article! you gave us smart concepts for places to go to ny. glad u have a fun time in there. and dont worry the pics not being relevant as a result of i believe they are . thanks for the post!

  7. And none is being awarded for anywhere else. Aid is increasingly being used overtly as a tool of foreign policy. The aid workers I know are aware of the risks they face. It is a question of knowing the limits of acceptable risks. Using a stars and stripes logo lies on the wrong side of stupid. The crazy thing is that can be killed for delivering their help. A friend once informed me about some of the suggestions you share however I thought it was not proper because I had some other opinion which had been kept with me for years. I think I should send him a letter immediately. Probably include your website link likewise. He too has to know more of the things people have everyone has learned from your blog post. I am appreciate all security guards of pakistan. glad u have a fun time in there. and dont worry the pics not being relevant as a result of i believe they are .com to post a comment to your blog.This blog site has got lots of very helpful information on it! Thanks for sharing it with me.

  8. Bitcoin has shown incredible growth over the last year and there are now some that are claiming that the bubble is soon to burst and Bitcoin crumble. Some of us continue to believe in the concept of an independent currency away from the reach of the financial establishment. We won’t accept that Bitcoin is finished. We will be staying with Bitcoin and we are quite confident that it will keep rising more rapidly than in the past. High street banks are naturally worried about the expansion of Bitcoin. Their worry is fuelled by the fact that bitcoin does not require large fees. Bitcoin fees are a fraction of the transaction compared to the charges that high street banks charge. The use of a surfing platform similar to Bitcoin Surfing may offer you the chance to find what new offers which are available related to bitcoin. Bitcoin Mining is a realistic way to begin building up a Bitcoin investment. Start a free Bitcoin account with Coinbase and earn $10 deposit of Bitcoin for nothing to get you started. There are many of offers to get you working with the new currency and Bitcoin Surfing is the best way to begin. The best thing is it won’t cost you anything.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s